MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Khand Brahmin Samaj Gudhachandra Ji Through Dinesh Chand Jaimini – Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam S/o Shyam Sunder Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This civil second appeal, which is reported to be time barred by 43 days, is accompanied with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (for brevity, “the Act of 1963”).
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in preferring the civil second appeal is condoned.
3. This civil second appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.2, Hindaun City (Karauli-Rajasthan) (for brevity, “the learned Appellate Court”) in Original Civil Appeal No.99/2012 (151/11) whereby, while dismissing the appeal, the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shri Mahavirji, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (for brevity, “the learned trial Court”) dismissing the Civil Case No.94/2001 [old 203/95 (141/98)] filed by the appellant-plaintiff (for brevity, “the plaintiff”) for permanent injunction, have been affirmed.
4. The relevant facts in brief are that the plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents/defendants (for brevity, “the defendants”) stating therein that there is a residential plot measuring 80f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.