US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
GANESH RAM MEENA
Jitendra Kumar Son of Shri Shripal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. The factual matrix of the case in brief is that on 01.07.2013 the respondent No.4 [Additional Director (Admn.), Medical & Health Department), issued an advertisement inviting applications from the eligible candidates for recruitment on the posts of Assistant Radiographer, Lab Technician and Lab Assistant. As per the facts available on the record, the petitioner submitted his Online application form. The petitioner stated in the application form that he has worked as a Lab Technician from 31.05.2005 to 28.02.2013 at ECHS Polyclinic, Churu under a Scheme maintained and operated by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence. The candidature of the petitioner was rejected by the respondents by not considering his experience certificate dated 28.03.2013 on the ground that it is not a genuine and authentic one, as required under the provisions of advertisement for the purpose of granting bonus marks and age relaxation. The petitioner submitted a representation to the respondents department in view of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6881/2015, decided on 06.10.2016. However, the
The main legal point established is that the petitioner was entitled to age relaxation and bonus marks as per the Rules of 1965 and the Circular/letter dated 08.02.2016, despite the rejection of his ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to consider experience certificates and the principles of natural justice in determining eligibility for the post of Laboratory Ass....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to age relaxation similar to other candidates, as supported by the Constitution of India, Article 226, and rel....
Contractual employees are entitled to age relaxation under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Eligibility for age relaxation requires direct employment and remuneration from RIMS, which the petitioner failed to prove.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that employees working on temporary, contractual, or adhoc positions are at par with regular employees in the matter of grant of age relaxation, as....
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
Experience certificates can be considered for bonus marks even if the candidate was not registered at the time of service, as long as eligibility criteria are met.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article