Back
SAMEER JAIN
Anirudh Sharma S/o Shri Damodar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Public Service Commission – Respondent
What is the correct approach to determine equivalence of degrees for public appointments when syllabi and curriculum differ but content may be equivalent? What is the effect of AICTE/University level equivalence clarifications on eligibility for recruitment in public posts? What is the court's position on judicial interference with administrative decisions on degree equivalence in public employment?
JUDGMENT :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:-
ii) issue appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent no.1-RPSC to consider the educational qualification of the Petitioner i.e. M.Tech. (Transportation Engineering) to be equivalent to M.Tech. (Traffic & Transportation Planning), as determined by Rajasthan Technical University, Kota;
iii) issue appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent no.1 -RPSC to publish the final result of the Petitioner pursuant to the advertisement dated 04.10.2022 and counselling convened on 21.12.2023;
iv) 'Any other appropriate direction or order which is deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court may also be issued/passed in favour of the humble Petitioner and in the interest of justice.”
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sandeep Pathak, submitted that the petitioner is aggrieved of the arbitrary and unjust action of the respondents in not extending appointment to the petitioner on the post of Assist
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
