SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1983

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Satish Kumar Sharma, J.
Jilshad & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3555 of 2021
Decided On : 17-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rambabu Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP, Mr. Arvind Sharma, for the Respondent.

[The central legal principle established is that adherence to procedural rules is critical for the proper functioning of the judicial system.]

Headnote:

[ORDER] - [Court Procedure] - [The court's order reflects the procedural requirements necessary for the case to proceed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established legal protocols in judicial proceedings.]

Fact of the Case:

[The case involves a procedural order issued by the court, detailing the necessary steps to be taken by the parties involved.]

Finding of the Court:

[The court found that the parties must comply with specific procedural rules to ensure a fair and orderly process.]

Issues: [The primary issue was whether the parties had adhered to the procedural requirements set forth by the court.]

Ratio Decidendi: [The court emphasized that compliance with procedural rules is essential for the integrity of the judicial process and the fair administration of justice.]

Result: [The court issued an order requiring the parties to follow the outlined procedures before the case could proceed further.]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top