SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Raj) 92

BAPNA, GUPTA
Nihal Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S. Bindra and Chand Mal,for the petitioner; Mansha Ram, Government Advocate for the respondent

Bapna, J.—This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The petitioner Mr. Nihal Chand Bhasin, presented the petition on the 25th of May, 1950, for a writ being issued by this Court to the State of Rajasthan and the Chief Secretary of the Government of Rajasthan directing them to refrain from enforcing an order of the Government of Rajasthan dated the 12th of May, 1950, by which the services of the petitioner were directed to be terminated with effect from the date he was relieved of his duties. The petitioner was at the time working as Assistant Commissioner, Civil Supplies Department of Rajasthan and posted at Bikaner.

3. According to the facts mentioned in the petition, [Mr. Bhasin was a legal practitioner in Lahore, and after the partition in August 1947, migrated to India and settled in Bikaner. He held a certain post in the former Government of Bikaner from October 1947 to 15th March 1948. After formation of Rajasthan he was appointed as Enforcement Officer Supplies Department, Bikaner, in August 1949 and continued to act as such till 21st February 1950, when he was appointed as Assistant Commissioner, Civil Supplies Department, Bikaner division, as per































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top