NAWAL KISHORE, BAPNA
Dhanna – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. This appeal has been preferred by them against the above order of the learned Sessions Judge and argued on their behalf by Mr. J. G. Sethi, Bar-at-Law, of the Punjab High Court at considerable length and Mr. Mansharam, the learned Government Advocate has addressed us on behalf of the State.
3. According to the prosecution story, the two accused and a third person, namely Phoola, Bishnois by caste and residents of neighbouring villages, attacked the deceased Dhanna on the between the 22nd and 23rd of July 1949 while he was asleep with his son Rajaram in his field which is situate at a distance of about three miles from the village. The motive for this attack is stated to be the strained relations between the parties. It is alleged that Jawana and Phoola accused owed Rs. 1400/- to the deceased and on their refusing to pay, four or five persons interceded but the accused put forward a cross claim against the deceased t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.