SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Raj) 179

NAWAL KISHORE
Hanuman Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Chandra, for Petitioner; Sumar Dan, for State

Nawal Kishore C. J.—-This is a revision by Hanuman Prasad against the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Banswara, upholding his conviction under section 304-A of the Penal Code.

2. The facts relating to the case, out of which this revision arises, may be stated briefly. On the 13th of November, 1947, Mst. Pushpan, a girl of five years of age, was taken to the Ayurvedic Dispensary at Arthuna in Banswara State, which was in the charge of the accused, Hanuman Prasad Vaid, for treatment for stomach ache from which she was suffering at the time. The relations, who accompanied her, asked the Vaid to give her an enema. Since the compounder of the Dispensary was 011 leave, the accused asked the relations accompanying the girl to call from the city one Magan Lal, who had previously served in the Dispensary. The Vaid prescribed a glycerine enema, and directed Magan Lal to administer it. All this took place in the upper storey of the Dispensary. The girl was taken down-stairs, and the enema was given by Magan Lal, but by mistake it was given in the vagina instead of the anus. The result was that the uterus burst, and there was profused bleeding. The Vaid, on being called, bandaged her, and


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top