SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Raj) 184

DUTT, GUPTA
Surajkaran – Appellant
Versus
Sitaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sohan Lal, for Appellants; Murli Manohar, for Respondents

Gupta, J. — This first appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs arises out of a suit filed by them against the respondents in the court of the District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur, on the 29th of April, 1947, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 29,531/-.

2. The main question that has been raised in this appeal before us relates to the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts in Marwar and it is to be determined whether or not did the defendants actually and voluntarily reside in Mundwa, Marwar at the commencement of the suit so as to give the courts in Marwar jurisdiction to entertain the suit. We have, therefore, to examine the pleadings of the parties and the evidence produced by them in this respect. The plaintiffs have stated it in their plaint that they themselves carried on the business of commission agents in Bombay in the name and style of Ramratan Sheo Bux and had a shop of the same name in Mundwa (Marwar) also, while the defendants who were real brothers, carried on their business in Nizamabad, Hyderabad State, in the name and style of Sitaram Satya Narain and in Mundwa, Marwar in the name and style of Shrikishen Sitaram and that they were the permanent residents of Mundwa Marwar. It was also sta






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top