SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 93

SHARMA
Deepsingh – Appellant
Versus
Sarwansingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S. Sahai, Advocate for Appellant; Ram Avtar, Advocate for Respondents

Sharma, J.—This is the plaintiffs second appeal against the appellate judgment and decree of the learned Additional Dist. Judge, Alwar, who set aside the decree of the Munsif Alwar in a suit for joint possession over certain property and declaration that the defendant No. 1 Sarwansingh was not an adopted son of Nahansingh deceased, and that the plaintiff was the owner of one half share in the property left by the deceased. The plaintiffs case is that according to the following pedigree he, along with Nahansingh is the nearest collateral of Nahansingh & was therefore entitled to one half of the property left by the deceased: —

Dulesingh



Kansingh Arjunsingh Nahansingh Died issueless)


Deft. No.2

Budhasingh(died issueless) Deepsinghplaintiff


Kishansingh SarwansinghDeft. No.1 Madansingh Vijeysingh

2. In March, 1939, the defendant No. 2, taking advantage of his Lambar-dari, got the name of his son Sarwansingh defendant mutated over the whole of the property of Nahansingh, falsely alleging him to be the adopted son of Nahansingh. The plaintiff was, therefore, entitled to joint possession of the property in suit along with Nahansingh, on a declaration that he was entitled to one hal














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top