SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Raj) 122

MEHTA
Kalulal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Narain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ganshiamdas, for Appellant

Mehta, J.—This appeal arises out of an application under O. 38, R. 5 C.P.C.

2. The plaintiffs brought suit on 27th November, 1948 against Kalulal and others for recovery of a sum of Rs. 9963/10/- in the court of the District Judge, Kishangarh. The defendants denied the plaintiffs claim. An application was filed by the plaintiff Shri Narain on 18th June, 1949 alleging that the defendants had mortgaged their property situated at Madan-ganj to Radha Mohan Shridhar and that they were also about to dispose of their property situated at Singara by way of sale with intent to obstruct the execution of any decree that might be passed against them in the suit and to deprive the plaintiffs of the fruits of such a decree. It was, therefore, prayed that the Singara property be attached before judgment. This application was accompanied by an affidavit. The District Judge Kishan-garh ordered this application to be put upon the date of hearing of the case, the 28th June, 1949. But on 21th June, 1949 the plaintiffs presented another application by way of reminder praying that orders on his previous application be passed as the defendants were about to alienate their property. Upon this application t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top