SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 44

BAPNA
Champalal – Appellant
Versus
Pannalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sohan Nath, for Appellant

Bapna, J.—This is a second appeal by the defendant in a suit for injunction.

2. The respondent filed a suit in the Court of Hakim, Pali on 30th September, 1944 against the appellant on the allegations that in Mohalla Brahampuri at Pali, there was a plot of land marked ABCD in the plan attached to the plaint, which was divided in equal portions between the parties and it was agreed on Besakh Sudi 5, Smt. 1999 that each co-sharer will leave a strip 3 ft. wide out of his land towards the other party so as to leave a way 6 feet wide between the two plots on which construction was to be made. It was alleged that the plaintiff left 3 feet towards the side of the defendant but that the defendant was bent upon making construction on the entire plot falling to his share without leaving a strip of land 3 feet wide out of his land as agreed upon. The defendant denied the agreement and asserted his right of making construction on the entire plot falling to his share. The plaintiff had filed along with the plaint a copy of the agreement keeping the original with him. When the case came up for trial the original was stated to have been lost and the trial court allowed the plaintiff to lead second




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top