Sharma, J.—This is one of the defendants appeal and arises out of a suit for redemption filed by the plaintiffs respondents against the defendants appellants in the Court of the Munsif, Bharatpur.

2. It was alleged that certain shops in the town of Bharatpur were mortgaged by Shankerlal, father of the plaintiff No. 1 Gopinath, plaintiff No. 2 Balkishan, and grand-father of Prem Narain minor, plaintiff No. 3, on the 28th of June, 1910 for a consideration of Rs. 500/- in favour of the defendants Chhoteylal, Nand Kumar, Badri Parsad and Dwarka Prasad. The rate of interest agreed upon was Rs.1/4/-% per mensem. It was recited in the mortgage deed that the rent of the mortgaged property at the time of the mortgage was Rs. 5/- per mensem. This rent would be credited towards interest. If the rent realized in future exceeded the amount of monthly interest, the excess would be credited towards principal.

3. The plaintiff alleged that Rs. 300/- were paid towards the mortgage money and the rent of the mortgaged property had been in excess of the monthly interest. Therefore, nothing was due to the mortgagees on account of principal and interest of the mortgage. On the contrary, some thing would b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document