SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 179

WANCHOO, BAPNA
Nathmal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Civil Supplies – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hasti Mal, for Applicant; B.B. Desai, for State of Rajasthan

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application by Nathmal and Mithalal under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction order, or writ in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them to be issued against the State of Rajasthan and certain officers of the State, who have been made parties to the application.

2. The facts, which have led to this application, are these. The petitioners are merchants at Raniwara, and deal in food-grains for which they held licence. On the 7th of October, 1950, the petitioners were informed by the sub-Divisional Officer, Bhinmal, that their stocks of bajra were frozen by him under orders of the Deputy Commissioner,Civil Supplies, Jodhpur. Later, they were informed by the Tehsildar of Jaswantpura that their stocks of bajra were requisitioned by the Government, and they were ordered to sell it at the rate of Rs. 9/-per mound. The petitioners made various representation to the Deputy Commissioner and Commissioner, Civil Supplies, and the Honble Minister for Supplies, but with ho effect. Their contention is that bajra is being allowed to be freely purchased and sold in the market, and no ceiling prices have been fixed by






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top