BAPNA, WANCHOO
Jeewan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The application has arisen out of an order by the Collector under the Rajasthan Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Ordinance, 1949 (No. XI of 1949). The Collector has passed an order under sec. 3, sub-sec. (4), of the Ordinance requisitioning the house of the applicant. The validity of the order has been challenged on various grounds. In the first place, it is submitted that the Ordinance could not remain in force after the 26th of January, 1950, and, therefore, the Collector had no authority to Act under it. In the second place, it is urged that the Ordinance is void, as it contravenes Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India, and imposes unreasonable restrictions on the exercise by the applicant of his right to acquire, hold and dispose of property. In the third place, it is submitted that as the Ordinance has not received the sanction of the President under Art. 31 (6), it is void in view of the provisions of Art. 31(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.