SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 219

BAPNA, WANCHOO
Jeewan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Messrs. Lakshmi Narain and Bal Krishna for applicant; L.N. Chagani, for state

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application by Jeewan Ram under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ or order in the nature of mandamus or prohibition or any other suitable writ against the state of Rajasthan and the Collector of Churu.

2. The application has arisen out of an order by the Collector under the Rajasthan Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Ordinance, 1949 (No. XI of 1949). The Collector has passed an order under sec. 3, sub-sec. (4), of the Ordinance requisitioning the house of the applicant. The validity of the order has been challenged on various grounds. In the first place, it is submitted that the Ordinance could not remain in force after the 26th of January, 1950, and, therefore, the Collector had no authority to Act under it. In the second place, it is urged that the Ordinance is void, as it contravenes Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India, and imposes unreasonable restrictions on the exercise by the applicant of his right to acquire, hold and dispose of property. In the third place, it is submitted that as the Ordinance has not received the sanction of the President under Art. 31 (6), it is void in view of the provisions of Art. 31(
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top