SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 35

WANCHOO, BAPNA
Thakur Akheysingh – Appellant
Versus
Mahaveerchand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kistoormal, for Appellant; Sohan Nath, for Respondents

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an appeal by Thakur Akhey Singh against the judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the High Court of the former State of Jodhpur. It has come before us for hearing under the provisions of Ordinance No. XL of 1949 and Ordinance No. XII of 1950. The appellant is the representative-in-interest of the defendant in the suit.

2. The suit was filed by Mutha Sumer Chandji, who is now represented in this appeal by his successors Mahaveer Chand and Shanti Chand. The case of the plaintiff was that Durjan Singhji, the father of the original defendant Sanwat Singh, had executed a registered deed of lease on Besakh Sudi 10, Smt. 1997 corresponding to 6th of May, 1941, in favour of the plaintiff. By this deed, Durjan Singhji leased out two villages, namely, Lavera Chhota, and Kajnau Bari, to the plaintiff for a period of 24 years. The plaintiff came in possession of the villages in July I94r, but the Thikana was taken under the Court of Wards in February, 1942, and therefore, the plaintiff was dispossessed from these villages. Later the Thikana was released from the Court of Wards and came in the possession of the jagirdar. Thereafter, the present suit was filed on the 23









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top