SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 205

WANCHOO, RANAWAT
Nathulal – Appellant
Versus
Durga Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Agrawal, for applicant; D.M. Bhandari, for Opposite Party

Ranawat, J.—On an application filed by the defendant under Art. 135 of the Constitution of India for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court an order was made by a Division Bench of this court, to which I was a party, on the 27th of November 1950, by which it was held that the defendant had a right to go in appeal to the Supreme Court under Art.133 of the Constitution of India, provided he can show that the value of detriment, which he would suffer on account of the execution of the decree is Rs. 20,000 -or upwards, which, would be the value of the entire property, as it now stands, including the additions made by the defendant after the filing of the suit. As the property had not been valued, a direction was issued to the District Judge, Jaipur City, to hold an enquiry in the matter and to submit his finding to this court. In pursuance of that order, the District Judge, Jaipur City, held an enquiry and he has submitted the papers back to this court along with his finding that the value of the entire property is more than Rs. 20,000/-. An objection petition has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff-decree-holder that the finding of the District Judge is erroneous and that in calculati














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top