SHARMA
Latoor Nath – Appellant
Versus
Gopeshwar – Respondent
2. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that under O. IX, R. 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure, the suit could be dismissed only if the summons had not been served upon the difendant in consequence of the failure of the plaintiff to pay the court-fee or postal charges, if any, chargeable for such service. The plaintiff had deposited process-fee, and the only thing that was required of him was to file a summons to the Collector, Sawai Madhopur. This summons was filed on the 17th of January, 1951. So the plaintiff had complied with the orders of the court, and it was for the court to issue the summons to the Collector after it had been filed on the 17th of January, 1951. The suit could not be dismissed under O. IX, R. 2, merely on account of summons being filed rather late.
3. On behalf of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.