SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 149

HETUDAN UJJWAL, K.S.RANAWAT
Gangu – Appellant
Versus
Mst. Dhanni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Radhey Shyam Vakil, for Gangu; Budh Prakash and Motilal Vakils, for Mst. Dhanni

H.D. Ujjwal—This is an application by Gangu and Bhairon under sec. 10 (2) of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance No. IX of 1949, against an order of the Anti Ejectment Officer, Jaipur dated 18.2.1952 by which he accepted the application presented by Mst. Dhanni under sec. 7 of the Ordinance and ordered her reinstatement on khasra number 639 and 635 in village Malikpur.

2. Mst. Dhanni applicant is the wife of Ladu and the non-applicants are the sons of Ladus brothers Sadhu and Ladu. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners Gangu and Bhairon that the land claimed by Mst. Dhanni is their joint property and they are entitled to cultivate the same like other kothis which they held jointly. Mst. Dhanni did not cultivate the land herself and her son Ghinsia and her grandson Bhomla were alive and they alone could claim this land and Mst. Dhanni had no right to file this application. Objection regarding the competence of Mst. Dhanni to file this application was raised in their reply given but inspite of this Mst. Dhanni did not join her son and her grand son in the application. She, therefore, had been wrongly ordered to be reinstated.

3. The learned Anti-Ejectment Officer has



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top