SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 287

Rajasthan High Court
Wanchoo, C.J. & Bapna, J.
Th. Ranjeet Singh - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Writ No. 32 of 1952
Decided On : December 08, 1952

Advocates Appeared:
Thanchand, for Petitioner; Kansingh, for State

Headnote:Marwar Police Act sec. 15(1)—Publication in Gazette mandatory—No liability unless notification published.Marwar Police Act, sec. 16—Immovable property cannot be attached for realization of costs.Constitution of India, Art. 226—Alternative remedy—Tax itself illegal or law imposing fine ultra vires—High Court will issue writ though alternative remedy available.Punitive Police—Costs—Non-publication of notification in gazette— Liability for tax—Realization, by attachment of immovable property— Alternative Remedy

       The provision as to publication of the proclamation in the official gazette and in such other manner is mandatory and not directory, and compliance with it is essential before liability can be cast on the landlords or inhabitants of the area. (Para 6)

       Sec. 16 of the Marwar Police Act provides for realization of the cost in the manner provided by secs. 386 and 387 of the Criminal P.C. Sec. 386 of the Criminal P.C. merely provides for the issue of a warrant by distress and sale of movable property. It does not authorise realization by attachment of immovable property, and collection of rents thereof. (Para 15)

       Where the levy of the tax itself is illegal or where the law imposing the tax is ultra vires the matter should be decided as early as possible and if a party comes to this Court, it is more convenient that the question of the legality of the law imposing the levy or the legality of the levy itself should be set at rest as early as possible. In such a case the High Court will grant the applicants prayer even though an alternative remedy was open to him which was equally beneficial, convenient and effectual. (Para 16)

       Under the orders of the Administrator Jodhpur punitive police force was quartered in Nanan on the ground that Nanan was in disturbed state. In September 1951 the Govt. of Rajasthan passed orders that half share of the petitioner (Jagirdar) in village Nanan be placed under State management till such time as the entire amount was recovered. Section 15 (1) of the Marwar Police Act required that there should be a notification in the official gazette declaring a place to be disturbed or dangerous. No such notification was published in official gazette. Provisions of sec. 15 (1) are mandatory and not directory and as these were not complied with, no liability was cast on the landlord or inhabitants to pay punitive tax. According to sec. 16 of the Marwar Police Act the tax could be realized in the manner provided by sec. 386 Cr.P.C. which did not authorize attachment. Art 265 of Constitution prohibits levy of tax except by authority of law. In the present case the tax being illegal High Court will issue writ even though alternative"remedy was open to petitioner.

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ, direction or order in the nature of prohibition forbidding the opposite parties, namely, the State of Rajasthan, and the Inspector General of Police, Rajasthan, from recovering from the applicant the cost of maintenance of additional police force at Nanan, and from taking possession of the applicants jagir for that purpose.

2. The case put forward by the applicant is this:—

He is the jagirdar of village Nanan in Tehsil Bilara. In 1948, the Dhani of one Prabudayal was ransacked by dacoits. Thereafter punitive police force was quartered in village Nanan under the orders of the Chief Secretary to the Administrator Jodhpur, dated 28th April, 1949, on the ground that Nanan was in a disturbed state. This police force remained in the village from May, 1949 to January, 1950, and the cost of maintaining this additional force for nine months came to Rs. 4,761/14/-. The Tehsildar of Bilara was ordered to recover this amount from the applicant who, however, refused to comply with this illegal order. Thereupon, the Government of Rajasthan passed orders in September,1951, that half share of the petitioner in village Nanan be placed under State management till such time as the entire amount was recovered. Consequently, in February, 1952, the Tehsildar ordered that possession be taken over and 21st May, 1952, was fixed for carrying out the order of the Tehsildar. The applicant filed this application on the 12th May, and his contention is that the order in question is illegal and the amount cannot be recovered from him. The main submission of the applicant is that sec. 15 of the Marwar Police Act 1948 requires that there should be a notification in the official gazette declaring a place to be disturbed or dangerous, and that it is only then that the Government is entitled to quarter additional police force in the area. As this notification was never issued, all subsequent proceedings for realization of the cost of the additional police, which amounts really to a punitive tax upon the applicant, were illegal, and this court should prohibit the opposite parties from realizing the amount from the applicant. It is also urged that in any case the money can only be realized as provided under sec. 16 of the Marwar Police Act and that it was not open to the Government to attach half the applicants jagir, and realize the amount by such attachment.

3. The application was opposed by the opposite parties. It was not denied that no notification was issued under sec. 15 of the Marwar Police Act. It was urged however that the provision regarding the issue of notification in the official gazette under sec. 15 was only directory and not mandatory, and that non-observance of that provision did not in any way invalidate the States authority to realize the cost of the additional police from the applicant. It was alleged that the applicant had due notice of the order of Government posting additional police at Nanan. As to the mode of realization, it was urged that the cost could be realized under sec. 16 of the Marwar Police Act; but that that was not the only method, of realizing the money, and that it could be realized in any other manner provided by law. But the reply did not point out what was the other provision of law under which realization was being made. Lastly, it was urged that there was an alternative remedy for the applicant, namely to file a civil suit, which would have been equally effective and efficacious, and therefore no writ should be issued in his favour.

4. The main question, that falls for consideration in this case, is the interpretation of sec. 15 of the Marwar Police Act which reads as follows :—

"15. (1) It shall be lawful for the Government by proclamation to be notified in the official gazette and in such other manner as the government shall direct, to declare at the any area subject to its authority has been found to be in a disturbed or danger

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top