SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 197

SHARMA
Munshi Iqbal Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Tiwari, for Applicant; P.N. Datt, for Respondent

Sharma, J.—This is an application by the complainant, Iqbal Hussain, in a case under secs. 147, 379 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code, which has been challaned in the Court of Extra Magistrate, Chirawa at Jhunjhunu, against Fateh Mohammad Shah and others. Fateh Mohammad Shah made an application before the Magistrate that he be exempted from personal attendance under sec. 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, because he was a Shajjadanashin, and had a lot of disciples, and was an old man of 60. The learned Magistrate exempted him from personal appearance on both the grounds of respectability as well as age. Against this order, the applicant Iqbal Hussain went in revision to the Court of Session at Jhunjhunu. The learned Sessions Judge held that sec. 205 Cr.P.C. was not applicable, but dismissed the application for revision on the ground that exemption could be given under sec. 353 Cr.P.C. The complainant has now come to this Court in revision.

2. It was argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that sec. 205 Cr.P.C. was not applicable according to the view of the learned Sessions Judge himself. He argued that sec. 353 Cr.P.C. too was not applicable as what it lays down is that



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top