SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 136

SHARMA
Thakur Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
N. V. Vakharia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.K. Mathur and B.B. Sharma, for Applicant; B.P. Agrawal, for Opposite party

Sharma, J.—This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, recommending that the personal appearance of Thakur Narendra Singh accused be dispensed with under sec. 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A complaint has been filed against him under sec. 341 I.P.C. in the Court of Third Assistant City Magistrate, Jaipur. The learned Magistrate issued a summons under sec. 204 Cr.P.C. for the accused to appear in person or by pleader. On the date fixed in the summons, an application was made on behalf of the accused under sec. 205 Cr.P.C. to dispense with his personal appearance. The learned Magistrate, after hearing both the parties, ordered that the accused should appear in person. Against this order, the accused went in revision to the Court of Session, Jaipur City, and the learned Sessions Judge has made the above reference.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The counsel for the complainant opposes the reference on the ground that there were special circumstances entitling the accused to the benefit of sec. 205 Cr.P.C. It was argued that the only grounds which have been given in the order of reference were that the accused was 55 to 60 years old



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top