SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 233

DAVE, SHARMA
Mst. Goran – Appellant
Versus
Jamna Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Tiwari, for Appellants; G.C. Kasliwal for Respondent No.4

Sharma, J.—This is an appeal by Mst. Goran and Bhonrilal defendants against the order of the learned District Judge, Jaipur City, appointing a receiver to realise the income from the property in suit.

2. The plaintiffs, who alleged themselves to be trustees of a certain trust called "Champalal Gopi Krishna Sahu Trust", created by Mst. Pokhli, averred in the plaint that the properties in suit belonged to Mst. Pokhli, who obtained a decree from the civil courts, Jaipur, against Mst. Goran for possession of those properties. The decree was obtained from the original court on the 4th of April, 1936, and was confirmed by the Jaipur Darbar on the 9th of December, 1939. The plaintiffs alleged that they obtained possession of the properties in suit in execution of the aforesaid decree on the 31st July, 1938, but thereafter the defendant, Mst. Goran, took possession of the properties illegally, and began to realise rents from the tenants. In their application for receiver the plaintiffs say that Mst. Goran has got no property from which the mesne profits might be realised in case the plaintiffs obtained a decree for possession and mesne profits. In order to show the financial position of Mst










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top