SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 240

SHARMA
Thakurji Shri Radhaballabhji – Appellant
Versus
Hazarilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sharma Ramesh Chandra, for Applicant; C.L. Agrawal, for respondent

Sharma, J.—These are two revision applications purporting to be filed by Thakurji Shree Radha Ballabhji through Devi Sahai and Surya Narain against the order dated 20th September 1950, of the learned Munsif, Bandikui, in two connected suits, one for ejectment and the other for arrears of rent filed on behalf of Thakurji Shree Radha Ballabhji against Hazarilal.

2. In both the suits, Ram Bilas Chowdhry, opposite party No. 2 in these applications, raised an objection that Devi Sahai and Surya Narain had adverse interest against the idol, and were not the proper persons to represent the deity, in the two suits. It was also alleged that the management of the temple was made by a committee known as Shri Radha Ballabhji Prabandhkarini Committee, of which the opposite Party No. 2 was the secretary. He should, therefore, be allowed to represent the deity as its next friend.

3. The learned Munsif held that Devi Sahai and Surya Narain had interest adverse to the deity, and that the opposite party No. 2 was the Secretary of the Committee, which was managing the temple. He, therefore, removed Devi Sahai and Surya Narain, and ordered that Rambilas Chowdhry be made the next friend. Against this ord








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top