SHARMA
Thakurji Shri Radhaballabhji – Appellant
Versus
Hazarilal – Respondent
2. In both the suits, Ram Bilas Chowdhry, opposite party No. 2 in these applications, raised an objection that Devi Sahai and Surya Narain had adverse interest against the idol, and were not the proper persons to represent the deity, in the two suits. It was also alleged that the management of the temple was made by a committee known as Shri Radha Ballabhji Prabandhkarini Committee, of which the opposite Party No. 2 was the secretary. He should, therefore, be allowed to represent the deity as its next friend.
3. The learned Munsif held that Devi Sahai and Surya Narain had interest adverse to the deity, and that the opposite party No. 2 was the Secretary of the Committee, which was managing the temple. He, therefore, removed Devi Sahai and Surya Narain, and ordered that Rambilas Chowdhry be made the next friend. Against this ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.