1952 Supreme(Raj) 283
DAVE, RANAWAT
Kotah Transport Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Authority Udaipur – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
N.L. Jain & B.S. Sharma, for Applicant; R.A. Gupta Government Advocate; P.D. Mantri, for Opposite parties
Ranawat, J.—These are seven applications under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India. In all these cases the facts are similar and the points raised! are also the same. They are therefore being dealt with together. The petitioner in all these cases is Kotah Transport Limited, Kotah, and they are all directed against the Regional Transport Authority but there are some other persons also, who have been impleaded as the opposite parties and they are different in each case. In Writ Application No. 591 Siraj Ahmad has been made opposite party No. 2. In Writ Application No. 592 National Motors, Kotah, has been impleaded as opposite party No. 2. In Writ Application No. 593 Messrs. Nazir Ahmed Abdul Majid are opposite party No. 2. In Writ petition No. 595 Mohammad Bux Mistri has been impleaded as opposite party No. 2. In Writ Application No. 596 Messrs. Rampratap Manakchand, and Messrs. Awatram Ratansingh are opposite parties Nos. 2 and 3. In Writ petition No. 597 Messrs. Anandilal Badrilal are opposite party No. 2. In Writ Application No. 598 Messrs. Mohammad Ali Munnabhai, Messrs. Ujagarsingh Sethi & Bros., and Mr. Kewalram Sindhi are opposite parties Nos. 2, 3, and 4, respectively,
2. Th
Click Here to Read the rest of this document