WANCHOO, DAVE
Jhunta – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue for Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The facts leading to this application are that on the 10th of August, 1950, the opposite party No. 2 Balu and his son No. 3 Ram Nath presented an application under sec. 7 of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 before the Anti Ejectment Officer, i.e., the Assistant Collector Sawai Jaipur. It was alleged by them that the second petitioner in this case Mahadeva was a khatedar tenant of sixteen fields in the village Talpatti, Tehsil Sawai Jaipur, that out of those* sixteen khasra Numbers, five fields numbering 77, 127, 129, 289 and 292 were in their sole cultivatory possession as sub-tenants from the Svt. Year 1997, while in the remaining eleven fields numbering 31, 290, 291, 294, 296, 297, 300, 426, 441, 442 and 443 they were co-tenants of the first petitioner Jhunta, that with the assistance of the petitioners Jhunta and Mahadeva, four persons namely Lalu, Mahadeva, Govinda and Kana had dispossessed them from the field and, therefore, their possession should be re-instated. That application was dismissed by the Assistant Collector on the 15th October, 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.