SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 45

MODI, WANCHOO
Chandanmal – Appellant
Versus
Roopnarain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal, for Petitioners

Modi, J.—In this review application the question that has arisen for our consideration is whether the court-fee paid thereon by the petitioners is sufficient. The judgment from which the review application has been preferred was pronounced by a Bench of this Court on the 9th of October, 1952. The review application was tiled on 3rd January, 1953. There is, therefore, no dispute that the review application was filed within 90 days of the judgment. The appeal was valued by the petitioners for purposes of court-fee at Rs. 13,569/8/- and the present review application has been valued at the same figure. The stamp reporter has reported that the court fee of Rs. 108/- paid by the petitioners is insufficient and that they should have paid one-half of the sum of Rs. 595/- on the review application inasmuch as the court-fee payable on the memorandum of appeal, if it should have been filed at the time the review application came to be made, would be a sum of Rs. 595/-. It may be pointed out that after the memorandum of appeal was filed on 18.9.46 and before the application for review was made, the Rajasthan Court-fees (Adaptation) Ordinance had come into force on January 25, 1950, according








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top