SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 42

WANCHOO, MODI
State – Appellant
Versus
Magraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kansingh Assistant Government Advocate; Dashrathmal, for Opposite party

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an appeal by the State against the order of the Sessions Judge of Bikaner acquitting Maghraj and Bhanwarlal of an offence under sec.6 of the Rajasthan Essential Supplies(Temporary Powers) Ordinance (No. XIII) of 1949 read with rule 3 of the Cotton Cloth and Yarn Dealers Licensing Order of 1943 passed by the former State of Bikaner.

2. The case for the prosecution was that Bhanwarlal was the proprietor of a shop known as "Agarwal Brothers" which carried on the business of selling country made cotton cloth in Bikaner State. Maghraj was said to be the Munib of Bhanwarlal working at this shop. No license, as required by rule 3 of the licensing order already referred to, was taken for carrying on the business of selling such cloth, and therefore the two accused were prosecuted. They were convicted by a Magistrate, and sentenced to a fine. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge has acquitted them. He has held that the Licensing Order in question expired on the 16th Sept 1945, as Rule 81 of the Defence of India Rules, under which it was issued, itself ceased to be in force on that day. He further held that the Magistrate erred in trying the case as a summons case, and t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top