SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 91

WANCHOO, BAPNA
State – Appellant
Versus
Motia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kansingh, Asstt. Government Advocate; Mahaveersingh, for Gepla and Motia

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal of Motia, Gepla and Achalia of offences under secs. 302 and 318 of the Indian Penal Code. Motia and Gepla have been served, and the appeal is, therefore, being heard against them. Achalia has not been found yet, and the appeal against him will remain pending.

2. The prosecution story is briefly this :

Harka deceased, his wife Mst. Chakhu, also deceased, and his daughter Jamuna, also deceased, used to live in village Bakra. Siremal P.W. 8 is a neighbour of Harka, his house being 40 paces away. He heard the cries of Mst. Rambha, mother of Harka deceased on the morning of the 8th December 1948. Mst. Rambha is blind, and was told by a child in the morning that Harka was lying dead, and therefore raised an alarm. Siremal went to Harkas house accompanied by Kistoorchand, and saw the dead bodies of Harka, his wife Chakhu and his daughter Jamuna lying there in the Pol. They, therefore, sent information to the police at Jalore. Sub-Inspector Hukamsingh immediately left for Bakra, and started investigation there. He found the cash box open and empty, and the Ora broken into, and it also seemed that ornaments were taken away fro















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top