Kishan Puri M.—This is an application in revision against the order of the Anti Ejectment officer, Bayana dated 6.9.52 accepting the application of Moti under sec. 7 of the Rajasthan Protection of Tenants Ordinance.

2. Moti filed an application on 21.8.52 and the court ordered notices to be issued to the opposite party for the next hearing fixed for 5.8.52. On this date out of eight persons against whom the application was presented by Moti and to whom notices were issued, only Inder Raj appeared and presented an application on 6.9.52 stating that he apprehended that justice would not be done to him by Shri Nathi Singh and therefore he would move an application for the transfer of the case.

3. The Anti Ejectment Officer ordered ex parte proceedings to be taken against all the seven respondents in the lower court and rejected the application put in by Inder Raj for stay of proceedings. The applicants main contention in this revision application is that the Anti Ejectment Officer acted in an injudicious manner in not allowing even one opportunity to Inder Raj for moving the Revenue Board for transfer of the case and decided the case against him on almost no evidence. It is further poin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document