SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 99

BAPNA, MODI
Kishanlal – Appellant
Versus
Ibrahim – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not available

MODI, J.—This is an appeal by Kishanlal and Pyarelal, by special leave, against a judgment and decree dated 24th November, 1948, of a learned single Judge of the High Court of the former State of Jodhpur.

2. It is only necessary to state a few facts as the point for determination in this appeal is a narrow one. On 31st July, 1946 (corresponding to Sawan Sudi 3rd, Svt. 2003) the appellants Kishanlal and Pyarelal obtained a decree against one Alladin, who is now represented by Ibrahim, in the court of the learned Judicial Superintendent, Jodhpur City, for possession of a house by preemption. The trial court directed that the plaintiffs shall deposit a sum of Rs. 2500/- within two months from the date of the decree failing which their suit shall stand dismissed with costs. The plaintiff appellants actually deposited the decretal amount on 30th September, 1946, corresponding to Asoj Sudi 5th, Svt. 2003. The respondent objected in the course of the execution of the decree by the plaintiff appellants that the latter had deposited the money after the period of two months stipulated in the decree, that such time should be calculated on the basis of the Vikram Samvat and not the Gregorian ca







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top