SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 152

MODI
Chandanmal – Appellant
Versus
Dawar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kanwar Bahadur, Government Advocate

MODI, J.—This is a reference by the Assistant Collector, Sojat, under sec. 40 of the Rajasthan Revenue Courts (Procedure and Jurisdiction) Act, 1951 (Act No. 1 of 1951), and has arisen in the following circumstances.

2. The plaintiffs Chandanmal and others are mortgagees in possession of a certain well called Nokhra Motora situated in village Mani, Tehsil Sojat. The plaintiffs claimed their possession in respect of half of this well by virtue of a Baraskati deed dated Asad Sudi 15, Svt., 2000, executed in their favour by defendants Dhulsingh and others and further alleged that they were also in possession of the other half obviously with the consent of the original owners and that they carried on cultivation on the well and the land in question for several years. Their grievance was that defendant No. 1 Dawar had commenced forcible cultivation on the well in question, and the said defendant was bent upon cultivating the land inspite of protest, and, therefore, they instituted the present suit. The plaintiffs prayed for an injunction restraining the defendant from carrying on any cultivation on the well in question and from interfering with their possession in any manner whatsoever.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top