WANCHOO, DAVE
Shankarlal – Appellant
Versus
Poonamchand – Respondent
2. The suit was brought by Poonam Chand for pre-emption with respect to the sale of a house in favour of Shankerlal. The right was based on vicinage as provided in the third clause of sec. 3 of the Law of Pre-emption in Marwar. The trial court decreed the suit, and therefore the defendant has come in appeal to this Court.
3. The relevant portion of sec. 3 is as follows: —
"The right of pre-emption in respect of a house or a building plot shall belong to the undermentioned in the following order :—
1st............................
2nd..........................
3rd—to a person owning immovable property touching the house or building plot in respect of which pre-emption is claimed.
A question was raised that the law of pre-emption has been invalidated in view of the provisions of Arts. 13 and 19 of the Constitution. The matter was considered in a Full Bench Decision of this Court in Panch Gujar Gaur Brahmans vs. Amarsingh (1) (1954 RLW, 204.). The question there arose with respect to Shafi-i-jar in the Mohammedan Law of pre-emption which prevailed in the town of B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.