WANCHOO, DAVE
Chitra Prakash Film Exchange – Appellant
Versus
Motilal – Respondent
2. A suit was filed by the plaintiff respondent against the defendant appellant and the 1st of March, 1953 was fixed for filing for written-statement. On that date the defendant appellant appeared and asked for time to file the written-statement and time was granted to him. Then 1st of April was fixed for filing the written-statement and on that date again defendant appellant for time for filing the written-statement and the next date fixed was 7th April, 1953. On that date, however, the defendant appellant instead of filing the written-statement filed an application under sec. 34 of the Arbitration Act for stay of proceedings.
3. The main question which arose for determination in this case was whether the defendant could take advantage of sec. 34 of the Arbitration Act. The section provides that an application under it has to be filed before filing the written-statement or taking any other step in the proceedings. In this case no written-statement was filed up to the 7th April. But the question is whether the defendant appellant had taken any other step in the proceedings. We are of opinion that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.