SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 150

SHARMA
Madho Narain – Appellant
Versus
Narhari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sagarlal, for Applicant; J.P. Jain, for Respondent

SHARMA, J.—This is an application by the plaintiff to revise the decree of the learned District Judge, Alwar in appeal by which the decree of the court of first instance was set aside. The plaintiff applicant filed a suit in the court of the Munsif, Alwar for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 202/- against Bhuralal defendant, since dead, and Narhari opposite party on the ground that a sum of Rs. 300/- was deposited on behalf of Deepa with Bhuralal for the expenses of a revenue appeal out of which Rs. 100/- had been taken back by Deepa and a sum of Rs. 200/- remained deposited with Bhuralal. Afterwards Deepa wanted this sum back and the plaintiff, therefore, approached the defendant with a request to return the said sum. The amount was not returned and the opposite party Narhari promising to pay it back executed a bond in favour of the plaintiff. Sometime after, however, this bond was taken back by the opposite party and his post office saving account pass-book was deposited with the plaintiff and a withdrawal form was also handed over to him. The money, however, could not be withdrawn from the post office as the time on that day was over and the opposite party took away the withdrawal f














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top