BAPNA, SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Banarsilal – Respondent
2 The facts are not disputed. In execution of a warrant issued by the Civil Judge, Jhunjhunu, on 12th December, 1950, in proceedings for execution of a decree in favour of Madanlal against Banarsilal certain moveable properties were attached by a process-server on 14th December, 1950. It is alleged that the property remained in a godown, and the judgment-debtor respondent got into the godown by breaking open a window on the night of 18th January, 1951, and removed some of the goods which had been attached. The accused denied the charge, but he was convicted by the learned Sub-Divional Magistrate, Khetri for an offence under sec. 457 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to undergo 2 months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-. On appeal, the learned Sessions Judge acquitted the accused on the ground that the warrant in pursuance whereof attachment of the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.