SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 80

RANAWAT, SHARMA
Nandkishore – Appellant
Versus
Brijbehari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Agrawal, for Appellants; D.M. Bhandari, for Respondents

Judgement Key Points

The court did not explicitly hold that joining a religious SACT (Sacred Act or similar religious practice) constitutes civil death. The provided legal document primarily discusses issues related to the validity of adoption, evidence of long-standing family conduct, and the presumption of adoption validity over a long period. It emphasizes that certain long-standing conduct and recognition in the family can lead to a presumption of adoption and that the burden of proof shifts accordingly. There is no specific mention or ruling in this document that directly addresses the concept of joining a religious SACT and its relation to civil death.


RANAWAT, J.—This is second appeal by Nandkishore and Mst. Birji against the judgment of the District Judge, Kotah, of the 31st of October, 1949, by which the judgment and decree passed by the court of the Civil Judge, Kotah, on the 30th of September, 1947, were set aside and the suit of the plaintiffs was decreed for possession of the disputed property with costs.

2. A suit was filed by Mst. Ramnathi as next friend of her two minor sons Brijbehari, and Bhawani Shanker against Nandkishore and his wife Mst. Briji in the court of the Sub-Judge, Kotah, for recovery of possession of a house of which the details were given in the plaint and which belonged to one Sheonarain who was an uncle in relationship to the plaintiffs. After the death of Sheonarain in January, 1944 his widow Mst. Surja Bai inherited his property as limited owner. She died on the 11th of March, 1945 and after her death Mst. Briji and her husband Nandkishore took possession of the properties left by her in pursuance of a will executed by her during her life time in favour of Mst. Briji. It was claimed by the plaintiffs that as they are the heirs of Sheonarain they are entitled to inherit the property left by Sheo Narai





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top