SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 207

WANCHOO, DAVE
Poonma – Appellant
Versus
Grain Panchayat of Koselao – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amrit Raj, for Petitioners; Kan Singh, Asst. G.A for State; Sohan Nath, for Non-Petitioner No.1

WANCHOO, C. J.—This is an application by Poonma and others under Art. 226 of the Constitution for issue of a writ of mandamus and prohibition and it is prayed that the Gram Panchayat, Koselao, be prohibited from functioning as such. It is further prayed that the Rajasthan Government be prohibited from realizing the fine imposed on the applicants.

2. The case of the applicants is that a body of persons was functioning as Gram Panchayat, Koselao, with Sardarmal Jain as Sarpanch. This Panchayat passed an order on the 3rd of July, 1950 requiring the applicants to remove their fencing from certain baras in their possession on the ground that the land enclosed in the fencing was open space of the village and part of village paths. Thereafter, on the 12th of July, 1950 the Panchayat imposed fines on the applicants on the ground that they had not carried out the order dated 3rd of July, 1950. These fines were imposed under sec. 17 (4) of the Marwar Village Panchayats Act, 1950. The applicants say that they approached the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bali, against the order of the Panchayat but failed to get any redress. Thereafter they moved the Minister incharge in revision. For some time the M



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top