SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 260

BAPNA
Chauthmal – Appellant
Versus
Pannalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.M. Trivedi, for Applicant; D.M. Bhandari, for Opposite Party

BAPNA, J.—This is a revision against an order of the Learned First Class Magistrate, Bhawani Mandi, dated 28th April, 1951, by which he declined to take cognizance of a case against certain persons on an interpretation of sec. 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A revision to the learned Additional Sessions Judge was unsuccessful.

2. The facts of the case are that the complainant Chauthmal filed a complaint in the court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Brijnagar, against the accused, who were officers of the Municipal Committee, Bhawani Mandi. Panna Lal accused No. 1 was the Secretary, Rajendrashanker accused No. 2 was the Sanitray Inspector, Bhanwarlal Chaudhry accused No. 3 was its President, Phoolchand Bhodhraj, and Kanwar Narainlal, accused Nos. 4, 5 and 6, were its members. The allegations were that the complainant had got certain repairs and alterations made to his house situated at Bhawani Mandi some time in January, 1950. The accused Nos. 3 to 6 with intention to cause loss and injury to the complainant ordered accused Nos. 1 and 2 to demolish the alterations and repairs, and the accused Nos. 1 and 2 carried out that order on the 14th of January, 1950. It was alleged that th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top