SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Raj) 182

BAPNA, RANAWAT
Th. Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P. Gupta, for Petitioner; C.B. Bhargava, Deputy Government Advocate

BAPNA, J.—This is a petitioner under Art. 226 of the Constitution of

India challenging the validity of the Rajasthan Government Order dated the 31st May, 1952. That order is as follows :—

"HOME DEPARTMENT.

Notification

Jaipur, 31st May, 1953.

No. F. 3(35) Police—A/52. Whereas the Rajpramukh is satisfied that the area shown in the schedule annexed here to has been found to be in a disturbed and dangerous state :

Now, therefore, in the exercise of the authority vested in him under sec. 15(1) of the Police Act (V of 1861),the Rajpramukh is pleased to declare that the 24 villages included in the said schedule shall be deemed to be disturbed area for a period of six months from the date of this notification.

Under sub-sec. 2 of the said sec. 15 of the Police Act (V of 1861) the Rajpramukh is pleased to authorise the Inspector General of Police to employ, at the cost of the inhabitants of the said area any Police force in addition to the ordinary fixed complement quartered therein.

Under sub-sec. 5 of sec. 15 of the said Act the Rajpramukh is further pleased to exempt the Harijan and Muslim inhabitants of these villages from liability to bear any portion of the cost on account of the posting of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top