SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 248

DAVE, WANCHOO
Th. Naharsingh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahaveersingh, for Applicant; L.N. Chhangani, Government Advocate

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application by Thakur Naharsingh for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Art. 132 and 133(1) (a)(b) & (c) of the Constitution against the judgment of this court, dated 23rd August, 1954, by which the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act (No. VI) of 1952 was held to be valid, and the writ petition of the applicant challenging its validity was dismissed.

2. A number of points have been raised on behalf of the applicant; but the main contention is that the applicant is entitled as of right to file an appeal before the Supreme Court under Art. 133(1)(a) & (b). The relevant portion of Art. 133(1) is as follows :—

"(1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order in a civil proceeding of a High Court in the territory of India if the High Court certifies :—

(a) that the amount or value of the subject-matter of the dispute in the court of first instance and still in dispute on appeal was and is not less than twenty thousand rupees or such other sum as may be specified in that behalf by Parliament by law; or

(b) that the judgment, decree or final order involved directly or indirectly or some claim or question re










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top