SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 189

WANCHOO, DAVE
Jubar Mal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal, for Applicant; L.N. Chhangani. Government Advocate

Wanchoo, C.J.—The following question has been referred to by a learned Single Judge of this Court to a larger Bench for decision—

"Whether the High Court or the subordinate courts have power under the Code of Criminal Procedure to grant bail to a person seeking bail even though he may not have been arrested or detained in custody and no warrant of arrest has been issued against him, but prays that a case has been registered against him by the police and he will be arrested and thereby disgraced if bail is not granted to him ?"

2. The circumstances, under which this reference has been made, may be briefly narrated. The applicants Jubar Mal and Panna Lal,who are residents of Ahor, district Jalore, made an application to the Sessions Judge. Balotra, for grant of bail under sec.498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They said that the police was trying to arrest them in order to insult and harass them, and they prayed for what is colloquially called anticipatory bail. This application was rejected, and thereupon they applied to this Court for grant of bail. They pointed out that a case under secs. 3 and 7 of the Essential Supplies Act has been registered against them, and was under inves
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top