SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 136

RANAWAT
Yogesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ratanlal, for Petitioner

Ranawat, J.—This is a civil revision petition by one Yogeshchandra. The facts leading to this petition are that a suit is pending in the court of the Munsiff, Udaipur, for an injunction against the defendants for restraining them from prescribing new books in the curriculum of Schools in Rajasthan. An interim injunction was sought in that court and it was allowed. The defendants went in appeal to the court of the District Judge. Udaipur, which was admitted. An objection was raised by the plaintiff-respondent before the District Judge that that court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal during vacations. The District Judge after hearing both the sides held on 23rd June, 1954, that he had jurisdiction to certain such an appeal during vacations in an interlocutory matter which was considered to be of urgent and emergent nature. The plaintiff has come to this court in revision against the aforesaid order of the District Judge on the grounds that firstly the District Judge had no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal during vacations and secondly that it was not a case which could be considered to be of an urgent of emergent nature.

2. It may be pointed out that the court of the Dis





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top