SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Raj) 158

MODI
Taj Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chhagansingh, for Petitioner; Kansingh, Deputy Government Advocate

Modi, J.—This is an application in revision by the accused Taj Khan against an order of the Special Judge, Udaipur, by which he framed a charge against the petitioner under sec. 161 read with sec. 116 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The facts of the case out of which this revision arises may shortly be stated as follows. On the 10th January, 1952, it is alleged that the accused offered a bribe of Rs. 500/- to the Income-tax Officer, A Ward, Udaipur, with a view to gain his favour in an assessment case relating to the petitioner pending before the said officer. The latter made a telephonic report to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Udaipur, who caused an investigation to be made, and it appears that the accused was caught almost red-handed. The accused was challaned in the court of the special Judge under sec 161 read with sec. 116 I.P.C. The learned Judge after recording the evidence produced by the prosecution has framed a charge against him under the aforesaid secs. This revision has been preferred against that order

2. It is contended before me that the entire proceedings before the learned Special Judge are illegal and deserve to be quashed. Learned counsel puts his case in t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top