MODI
Taj Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. The facts of the case out of which this revision arises may shortly be stated as follows. On the 10th January, 1952, it is alleged that the accused offered a bribe of Rs. 500/- to the Income-tax Officer, A Ward, Udaipur, with a view to gain his favour in an assessment case relating to the petitioner pending before the said officer. The latter made a telephonic report to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Udaipur, who caused an investigation to be made, and it appears that the accused was caught almost red-handed. The accused was challaned in the court of the special Judge under sec 161 read with sec. 116 I.P.C. The learned Judge after recording the evidence produced by the prosecution has framed a charge against him under the aforesaid secs. This revision has been preferred against that order
2. It is contended before me that the entire proceedings before the learned Special Judge are illegal and deserve to be quashed. Learned counsel puts his case in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.