BAPNA, DAVE
Sitaram – Appellant
Versus
Hariprasad – Respondent
2. A few facts, which are no longer in dispute between the parties, may be briefly stated for proper appreciation of the case. Both the praties are residents of Mundwa village which is situated in Nagaur district. Appellant No. 1 Sitaram is an adopted son of Govindram and appellant No. 2 is his widowed mother. It is common ground between the parties that Govindram, adoptive father of appellant No. 1 and Heeralal, father of the respondent Hariprasad had monetary dealings prior to Samwat 1988. On Kartik Vad 9 Samwat 1988 an account was settled between them and a balance of Rs. 4700/- was found against the resopndents father payable to Govindram. There were no further advances or payments from one side to the other after that date.
3. The appellants case in the trial court was that on Kartik Sud 1 Samvat 1997, the respondents father executed a document (marked Ex. P.l) admitting his liability to pay Rs. 10,574/- on that date. The suit was based on this document and the plaintiff prayed for the recover
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.