Wanchoo, C.J.—In this case a reference has been made by a learned single Judge, and two questions have been referred to a larger Bench for reply, namely—

(1) Whether an order of remand made by an appellate court would be covered by O. 41, r. 23 of the Civil Procedure Code even though decision of the trial court on the preliminary point on which the suit is decided is not reversed ?

(2) Whether an appeal against an order of remand purported to have been made under O. 41. r.23 would lie under O. 43, r.1 even though the order is not strictly covered by the first provision ?

2. The facts, which have led to this reference, may be briefly narrated. A suit was brought by Ratanraj for recovery of certain sum of money on the basis of a khata said to have been executed by the defendant Kripa Shanker and his brother who was father of other defendants in favour of the plaintiffs. The suit was resisted, and among other grounds the defendants pleaded that the document, on which the suit was founded, was inadmissible in evidence as it was an acknowledgment, and was not stamped. Three issues were framed by the trial court, and one of them was whether the document sued upon was admissible in evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document