SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 57

SHYAMLAL, KANWAR BAHADUR
Naharmal – Appellant
Versus
Jagdambalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jiwan Singh Chordia, for Appellant; Laxmi Narayan Yadav, for Respondent

This is an appeal against an order of the Additional Commissioner, Udaipur, dated 16.10.1954 in a case relating to entries in the revenue papers.

2. We have heard the parties and have examined the record as well. Put briefly the facts of the case are that in 1939 the entry in respect of the land in dispute in the Record of Rights stood in the name of Hiralal as kharamdar tenant with Pyarelal as a mortgagee in possession. On Asadh badi 13, Svt. 1995 (roughly corresponding to 18th June, 1939), Namedar of Niyobat Bhawana of the former Mewar State submitted a report to his officer that Pyarelal mortgagee was not regular in payment of rents and that the land was being cultivated by some tenants under him, hence steps be taken either to ensure regular payments of rents by Pyarelal or the actual tenants names be entered in the papers. Eventually this report after many journeys to and fro reached the Hakim Devasthan who passed the following order on 30.12.1939.

"Returned in original with the remarks that Beni Rams khata is under mortgage with Pyarelal who does not pay rent regularly at the appointed time, nor does he attend to written requests. Under these circumstances it is unnecessary to








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top