SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 80

RANAWAT, BAPNA
Abani Kumar Mukherji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P. Gupta, for Appellant; C.B. Bhargava, Dy. Govt. Advocate for Respondent

Bapna, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution,

2. The petitioner, Shri Abani Kumar Mukherji, was recognised as the successor of late Shri Babu Satkori Mukherji by an order of the Raj Pramukh dated the 21st of Feb., 1951. The order of recognition imposed a liability to pay Rs. 9605/0/6 by way of dues chargeable on the succession. The petitioner was to pay this amount by six half-yearly instalments The petitioner paid Rs 1605/8/3 on 29th January, 1952, and Rs. 1600/- on 2nd June, 1952. He was called upon by an order of the Collector, dated 2nd June, 1952, to deposit 6-1/4% on account of batta (exchange ratio between jharshahi and kaldar coins) over and above the aforesaid amounts as the liability imposed was said to be in jharshahi coin. It was alleged by the petitioner that the Collector, who is respondent No. 2, issued orders to realise the amount of batta on the above amounts as also on all future instalments by means of a penalty of Rs. 5/- per day, known as dastak. It was alleged that the order imposing a liability did not mention that batta of 6-1/4% was realisable in addition to the sum named in the order. It was also alleged that jharshahi rupee coin had ceas









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top