WANCHOO, DAVE
Ramjiwan Ramnath – Appellant
Versus
Roop Chand – Respondent
2. The facts are that the appellant obtained a decree against Chhogmal and his sons Roopchand and others, who are respondent in the present appeal, from the Calcutta High Court on the 3rd of February, 1938. The appellant got this decree transferred to Aligarh in 1949, and applied for execution by arrest of Chhogmal, judgment-debtor, in December 1949. The proceedings in the Aligarh court are said to have come to an end sometimes in 1950. Thereafter, the appellant got the decree transferred to the court at Merta and applied for execution.
3. The execution of the decree was objected to by the judgment-debtors respondents, and, among other pleas, they raised a plea that the execution was barred by time. The case of the appellant decree-holder, however, was that by virtue of the ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.