SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 264

WANCHOO, DAVE
State – Appellant
Versus
Indraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.N. Chhagani, Government Advocate; Shrikishanmal, for Respondent

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an appeal by the State against the acquittal of Indraj by a Magistrate of the First class of an offence under sec. 454 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The prosecution case was briefly this. Shivkaran and his family lived in Nangal Bari. He and members of his family had gone out to their fields on the morning of 29th of September,1952 and had shut up the house When they returned in the evening they found that the door of the house was open and that the lock of an almirah inside the house had been broken. The almirah contained Rs. 350/- in currency notes and a tin-box containing gold and silver ornaments. The money as well as the box of ornaments was found missing. It was also stated in the first report that the house of the accused Indraj was next door and that the accused knew that the money add ornaments were in that almirah. Suspicion was expressed against Indraj on the other ground that he was a gambler It was also explained that there was delay in the report as they were trying all along to find out about the theft

3. The report of the incident was made in the Thana on the 3rd of October, 1952. The police arrived on the scene on the 4th of October and it is sa















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top