WANCHOO, DAVE
Baboolal – Appellant
Versus
Nathmal – Respondent
2. One of the defendants, namely Ram-lal presented his written statement on 26th of May, 1946. He admitted the fact that Chintamandas had mortgaged his shop with the Firm Moolchand Ramlal for Rs. 475/-. He however, pleaded that he had separated him
(1) Harla vs. The State of Rajasthan (AIR 1951 SC 467).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.